Featured Post

Consolidate Your Vision to Navigate through Challenging Educational Landscape

Image
The medias, both social and mainstream, is both frenzy and abuzz with the news of a teacher being implicated by court for using corporal punishment as a method to punish underachievement in academic outcome and as possible means to boost future performance. Although corporal punishment has been legally banned in education/ school, the practice still find its spot for numerous reasons. In my analysis, teachers personal belief system on half truths of educational theories and system induced stress on teacher performance tops the reasons for the existence of corporal punishment in schools. AI generated image 1. The educational Trap of Omnipotence, cultural beliefs on adverse conditioning, and misinterpreted theories As our teachers long ago believed that corporal punishment can induce learning behaviors boosting academic achievement, do today's teachers believe the same? I have seen many do hold on to those believe. It is either because of ignorance or cultural tendency to disbelieve ...

Story of Sweets

I went to a shop for a cane of fish. I 
The fact in the above story is shopkeeper is gaining small amount of profit at the cost of his moral conduct and character. Is it worth it? Will you repeat his dark doing?  charged Nu. 72. I paid the shopkeeper Nu. 75 who gave me 3 sweets instead of Nu. 3. I confessed, “I don’t eat sweets” but he insisted on keeping them as he does not have change. Next day I went to same shop for a bottle of tomato sauce. The Maximum Retail Price was Nu. 97. I paid Nu. 95 and gave back two sweets. To my surprise, shopkeeper rejected the payment. I said that was the same sweet he gave me the other day, but he said that’s a different case. I protested for a while yet he again claimed and debated about the cases being different. He frowned a bit at me too. So I paid him Nu. 5 and he gave me three more sweets.
Liverpool University Image 
I wondered why those two cases are different. To me, both of us are doing business whether buying or selling and cases are same except that I am not angry when he gave me sweets in moneys stead but he was angry when I gave back the same sweets.

What can you take away from this story? What is one messgae that this story coveys? There can be myriad scope of interpretation and it is open for any interpretation. However, there is one thing I wanted to convey specifically through this story. 
To sum up and get things straight, in business community, civil organization or any sort of organization where human dialogues and interactions are involved, high value and priority should be attached to mutual benefit over individual profit. People should be given dignified consideration over the materials with less cleverness but good character. Individual morality should humanize academic exchange, business conduct, public services, and all sort of human interactions and exchange. We are consistently, unconsciously, getting ourselves morally naked for mere sake of profit and materialistic scramble. This is dangerous and you know why.

It is now that we must replenish and restore our moral delight and stop impoverishing human society.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Mask Dance of Tiger and Bear (སྟག་དང་དོམ་གྱི་སྐུ་འཆམ་)

Is prolonged meeting a symptom of system Deficiency or Efficiency?

The Divine Stones of Singay Thang ༼སེང་གེ་ཐང་གི་གནས་རྡོ༽